Commit ef65d8da authored by David Benjamin's avatar David Benjamin
Browse files

Use the newer names for STACK_OF(T) functions with BoringSSL 

This is yet another symptom of
https://github.com/sfackler/rust-openssl/issues/1944.

Ideally rust-openssl would use the type-safe wrappers, which are the
actual public APIs. Right now, rust-openssl's STACK_OF(T) handling is a
safety regression from C. This PR doesn't address the safety issue, only
works around the BoringSSL porting issue.
parent 9b90b7d9

openssl/src/stack.rs

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ use crate::util::ForeignTypeExt; 
use crate::{cvt, cvt_p, LenType};



cfg_if! {

    if #[cfg(ossl110)] {

    if #[cfg(any(ossl110, boringssl))] {

        use ffi::{

            OPENSSL_sk_pop, OPENSSL_sk_free, OPENSSL_sk_num, OPENSSL_sk_value, OPENSSL_STACK,

            OPENSSL_sk_new_null, OPENSSL_sk_push,